[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHUa44FEkdtA+4AuoQnNEnObKzcUX3qkFD8iV8Z_pGJ7ZPWw2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 17:34:10 +0100
From: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
To: Randy Li <ayaka@...lik.info>
Cc: op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sumit.garg@...aro.org
Subject: Re: optee: os: toolchains would include linux target macros likes __linux__
Hi Randy,
On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 2:39 PM Randy Li <ayaka@...lik.info> wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I wonder why Optee OS would use a linux target toolchains but not a bare
> metal target(none os)?
I guess it started with that we didn't want to download both one Linux
and one bare metal toolchain. We need both AArch32 and AArch64
versions so it doubles up.
>
> gcc-arm-10.3-2021.07-x86_64-aarch64-none-linux-gnu/bin/aarch64-none-linux-gnu-gcc
> -dM -E - < /dev/null|grep linux
> #define __linux 1
> #define __gnu_linux__ 1
> #define linux 1
> #define __linux__ 1
>
> That makes hard to share a header files between Linux kernel and Optee.
> We like to pass some structure in SHM, but optee don't have all those
> Linux types likes <linux/types.h>.
Surely you can define a .h file in a way that you can include it in
both environments. We try to stick to ISO C.
>
> If optee didn't choose the toolchains for the Linux, we could easily
> decide which part would use for Client Agent(Linux kernel) side or TEE
> OS side.
>
> Why we don't use bare metal toolchains ?
Feel free to do so.
Cheers,
Jens
Powered by blists - more mailing lists