linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with the block tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 4 Dec 2023 11:37:44 -0500
From:   Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with the block tree

On Sun, Dec 3, 2023 at 8:03 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the security tree got conflicts in:
>
>   security/selinux/hooks.c
>   security/smack/smack_lsm.c
>
> between commit:
>
>   bf18dde00aa9 ("io_uring: split out cmd api into a separate header")
>
> from the block tree and commit:
>
>   f3b8788cde61 ("LSM: Identify modules by more than name")
>
> from the security tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc security/selinux/hooks.c
> index 17ec5e109aec,b340425ccfae..000000000000
> --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
> +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> @@@ -91,7 -91,8 +91,8 @@@
>   #include <uapi/linux/mount.h>
>   #include <linux/fsnotify.h>
>   #include <linux/fanotify.h>
>  -#include <linux/io_uring.h>
>  +#include <linux/io_uring/cmd.h>
> + #include <uapi/linux/lsm.h>
>
>   #include "avc.h"
>   #include "objsec.h"
> diff --cc security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> index 2cdaa46088a0,53336d7daa93..000000000000
> --- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> +++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> @@@ -42,7 -42,8 +42,8 @@@
>   #include <linux/fs_context.h>
>   #include <linux/fs_parser.h>
>   #include <linux/watch_queue.h>
>  -#include <linux/io_uring.h>
>  +#include <linux/io_uring/cmd.h>
> + #include <uapi/linux/lsm.h>
>   #include "smack.h"
>
>   #define TRANS_TRUE    "TRUE"

Thanks Stephen, the above patch looks fine to me.

-- 
paul-moore.com