[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACOAw_x-QMsCyW9Tiw408TSfKXudBnJUJ7Pc3VkRmYQ-vi+eug@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 10:53:10 -0800
From: Daeho Jeong <daeho43@...il.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: allocate new section if it's not new
LGTM
On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 10:06 AM Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> If fsck can allocate a new zone, it'd be better to use that instead of
> allocating a new one.
>
> And, it modifies kernel messages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 08e2f44a1264..9081c9af977a 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -4949,20 +4949,18 @@ static int check_zone_write_pointer(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> return ret;
> }
>
> - if (is_set_ckpt_flags(sbi, CP_UMOUNT_FLAG)) {
> - /*
> - * If there are valid blocks and the write pointer doesn't match
> - * with them, we need to report the inconsistency and fill
> - * the zone till the end to close the zone. This inconsistency
> - * does not cause write error because the zone will not be
> - * selected for write operation until it get discarded.
> - */
> - f2fs_notice(sbi, "Valid blocks are not aligned with write "
> + /*
> + * If there are valid blocks and the write pointer doesn't match
> + * with them, we need to report the inconsistency and fill
> + * the zone till the end to close the zone. This inconsistency
> + * does not cause write error because the zone will not be
> + * selected for write operation until it get discarded.
> + */
> + f2fs_notice(sbi, "Valid blocks are not aligned with write "
> "pointer: valid block[0x%x,0x%x] wp[0x%x,0x%x]",
> GET_SEGNO(sbi, last_valid_block),
> GET_BLKOFF_FROM_SEG0(sbi, last_valid_block),
> wp_segno, wp_blkoff);
> - }
>
> ret = blkdev_zone_mgmt(fdev->bdev, REQ_OP_ZONE_FINISH,
> zone->start, zone->len, GFP_NOFS);
> @@ -5053,15 +5051,18 @@ static int fix_curseg_write_pointer(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type)
> f2fs_notice(sbi, "Unaligned curseg[%d] with write pointer: "
> "curseg[0x%x,0x%x] wp[0x%x,0x%x]", type, cs->segno,
> cs->next_blkoff, wp_segno, wp_blkoff);
> - } else {
> - f2fs_notice(sbi, "Not successfully unmounted in the previous "
> - "mount");
> }
>
> - f2fs_notice(sbi, "Assign new section to curseg[%d]: "
> - "curseg[0x%x,0x%x]", type, cs->segno, cs->next_blkoff);
> + /* Allocate a new section if it's not new. */
> + if (cs->next_blkoff) {
> + unsigned int old_segno = cs->segno, old_blkoff = cs->next_blkoff;
>
> - f2fs_allocate_new_section(sbi, type, true);
> + f2fs_allocate_new_section(sbi, type, true);
> + f2fs_notice(sbi, "Assign new section to curseg[%d]: "
> + "[0x%x,0x%x] -> [0x%x,0x%x]",
> + type, old_segno, old_blkoff,
> + cs->segno, cs->next_blkoff);
> + }
>
> /* check consistency of the zone curseg pointed to */
> if (check_zone_write_pointer(sbi, zbd, &zone))
> --
> 2.43.0.rc2.451.g8631bc7472-goog
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists