[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <170171822243.157597.14987594819577549531.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2023 19:30:22 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
Cc: sound-open-firmware@...a-project.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: Move sof_of_machine_select() to core.c from
sof-of-dev.c
On Mon, 04 Dec 2023 11:35:47 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> This reverts commit 014fdeb0d747304111cfecf93df4407c1a0c80db.
>
> Commit 014fdeb0d747 ("ASoC: SOF: Move sof_of_machine_select() to
> sof-of-dev.c from sof-audio.c") caused a circular dependency between
> the snd_sof and snd_sof_of modules:
>
> depmod: ERROR: Cycle detected: snd_sof -> snd_sof_of -> snd_sof
> depmod: ERROR: Found 2 modules in dependency cycles!
>
> [...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: SOF: Move sof_of_machine_select() to core.c from sof-of-dev.c
commit: d0ae9dc48e24f5f704abcbb2dca3e4651bf0ff59
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
Powered by blists - more mailing lists