[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZW41bFSyg/xQLcEg@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 17:24:12 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf test: Add basic perf diff test
Em Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 08:00:35AM -0800, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 11:04 AM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > There are some old bug reports on perf diff crashing:
> > https://rhaas.blogspot.com/2012/06/perf-good-bad-ugly.html
> >
> > Happening across them I was prompted to add two very basic tests that
> > will give some perf diff coverage.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
>
> Ping.
Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists