[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZW4zvk2ZUnLuFgFK@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 17:17:02 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, mark.rutland@....com, namhyung@...nel.org,
jolsa@...nel.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com, ravi.bangoria@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Ammy Yi <ammy.yi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf mem: Fix perf mem error on hybrid
Em Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 06:08:13PM -0800, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 1:43 PM Liang, Kan <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On 2023-11-30 3:36 p.m., Ian Rogers wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 1:15 PM Liang, Kan <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > Anyway, if you don't feel like the refactor we can move forward with
> > > this or a v2, let me know.
> > I think the refactor is doable. I will work on it next week.
> > But I think it should be on top of this fix.
> > If you are OK with the fix, I think it's better to have it merged first.
> > So everything would work properly. The validation work will not be blocked.
> > Then I can send a patch set to cleanup the perf mem events separately.
> Thanks Kan.
> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists