[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <170172387681.7109.15402426750268670177@noble.neil.brown.name>
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2023 08:04:36 +1100
From: "NeilBrown" <neilb@...e.de>
To: "Matthew Wilcox" <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: "Al Viro" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@...nel.org>,
"Jens Axboe" <axboe@...nel.dk>, "Oleg Nesterov" <oleg@...hat.com>,
"Chuck Lever" <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
"Jeff Layton" <jlayton@...nel.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Juri Lelli" <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
"Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Allow a kthread to declare that it calls task_work_run()
On Mon, 04 Dec 2023, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 12:36:41PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> > +++ b/fs/namespace.c
> > @@ -1328,7 +1328,7 @@ static void mntput_no_expire(struct mount *mnt)
> >
> > if (likely(!(mnt->mnt.mnt_flags & MNT_INTERNAL))) {
> > struct task_struct *task = current;
> > - if (likely(!(task->flags & PF_KTHREAD))) {
> > + if (likely((task->flags & PF_RUNS_TASK_WORK))) {
>
> You could lose one set of parens here ...
>
> if (likely(task->flags & PF_RUNS_TASK_WORK)) {
Done.
>
> > #define PF_RANDOMIZE 0x00400000 /* Randomize virtual address space */
> > -#define PF__HOLE__00800000 0x00800000
> > +#define PF_RUNS_TASK_WORK 0x00800000 /* Will call task_work_run() periodically */
>
> And you could lose "Will" here:
>
> #define PF_RUNS_TASK_WORK 0x00800000 /* Calls task_work_run() periodically */
Better - thanks.
>
> > diff --git a/kernel/task_work.c b/kernel/task_work.c
> > index 95a7e1b7f1da..aec19876e121 100644
> > --- a/kernel/task_work.c
> > +++ b/kernel/task_work.c
> > @@ -183,3 +183,4 @@ void task_work_run(void)
> > } while (work);
> > }
> > }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(task_work_run);
>
> _GPL?
Justification?
Thanks,
NeilBrown
Powered by blists - more mailing lists