[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2312041331210.110490@ubuntu-linux-20-04-desktop>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 13:31:27 -0800 (PST)
From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
To: "Chen, Jiqian" <Jiqian.Chen@....com>
cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@...m.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"Stabellini, Stefano" <stefano.stabellini@....com>,
"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
"Koenig, Christian" <Christian.Koenig@....com>,
"Hildebrand, Stewart" <Stewart.Hildebrand@....com>,
"Ragiadakou, Xenia" <Xenia.Ragiadakou@....com>,
"Huang, Honglei1" <Honglei1.Huang@....com>,
"Zhang, Julia" <Julia.Zhang@....com>,
"Huang, Ray" <Ray.Huang@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC KERNEL PATCH v2 1/3] xen/pci: Add xen_reset_device_state
function
On Mon, 3 Dec 2023, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> >> vpci device state when device is reset on dom0 side.
> >>
> >> And call that function in pcistub_init_device. Because when
> >> we use "pci-assignable-add" to assign a passthrough device in
> >> Xen, it will reset passthrough device and the vpci state will
> >> out of date, and then device will fail to restore bar state.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jiqian Chen <Jiqian.Chen@....com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
> >
> > This Signed-off-by chain is incorrect.
> >
> > Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst has a full chapter about
> > S-O-B and the correct usage.
> I am the author of this series of patches, and Huang Rui transported the v1 to upstream. And now I transport v2. I am not aware that the SOB chain is incorrect.
> Do you have any suggestions?
I think he means that your Signed-off-by should be the second one of the
two as you are the one submitting the patch to the LKML
Powered by blists - more mailing lists