[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9851ccdf-7105-4531-80d4-199ef3496af5@csgroup.eu>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 23:14:31 +0000
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: George Stark <gnstark@...utedevices.com>,
"pavel@....cz" <pavel@....cz>, "lee@...nel.org" <lee@...nel.org>,
"vadimp@...dia.com" <vadimp@...dia.com>,
"mpe@...erman.id.au" <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"npiggin@...il.com" <npiggin@...il.com>,
"hdegoede@...hat.com" <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
"mazziesaccount@...il.com" <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
"andy.shevchenko@...il.com" <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
"jic23@...nel.org" <jic23@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-leds@...r.kernel.org" <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"kernel@...utedevices.com" <kernel@...utedevices.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] leds: aw2013: use devm API to cleanup module's
resources
Le 04/12/2023 à 19:05, George Stark a écrit :
> In this driver LEDs are registered using devm_led_classdev_register()
> so they are automatically unregistered after module's remove() is done.
> led_classdev_unregister() calls module's led_set_brightness() to turn off
> the LEDs and that callback uses resources which were destroyed already
> in module's remove() so use devm API instead of remove().
>
> Signed-off-by: George Stark <gnstark@...utedevices.com>
> ---
> drivers/leds/leds-aw2013.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-aw2013.c b/drivers/leds/leds-aw2013.c
> index c2bc0782c0cd..1a8acf303548 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-aw2013.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-aw2013.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> // Driver for Awinic AW2013 3-channel LED driver
>
> +#include <linux/devm-helpers.h>
> #include <linux/i2c.h>
> #include <linux/leds.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> @@ -318,6 +319,13 @@ static int aw2013_probe_dt(struct aw2013 *chip)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void aw2013_chip_disable_action(void *data)
> +{
> + struct aw2013 *chip = (struct aw2013 *)data;
The cast is not needed because data is void*
And chip is not needed at all, you can pass data to
aw2013_chip_disable() directly, without a cast either.
> +
> + aw2013_chip_disable(chip);
> +}
> +
> static const struct regmap_config aw2013_regmap_config = {
> .reg_bits = 8,
> .val_bits = 8,
> @@ -334,7 +342,9 @@ static int aw2013_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> if (!chip)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - mutex_init(&chip->mutex);
> + if (devm_mutex_init(&client->dev, &chip->mutex))
> + return -ENOMEM;
Why not return the value returned by devm_mutex_init() ?
> +
> mutex_lock(&chip->mutex);
>
> chip->client = client;
> @@ -378,6 +388,10 @@ static int aw2013_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> goto error_reg;
> }
>
> + ret = devm_add_action(&client->dev, aw2013_chip_disable_action, chip);
> + if (ret)
> + goto error_reg;
> +
> ret = aw2013_probe_dt(chip);
> if (ret < 0)
> goto error_reg;
> @@ -398,19 +412,9 @@ static int aw2013_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>
> error:
> mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex);
> - mutex_destroy(&chip->mutex);
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static void aw2013_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> -{
> - struct aw2013 *chip = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> -
> - aw2013_chip_disable(chip);
> -
> - mutex_destroy(&chip->mutex);
> -}
> -
> static const struct of_device_id aw2013_match_table[] = {
> { .compatible = "awinic,aw2013", },
> { /* sentinel */ },
> @@ -424,7 +428,6 @@ static struct i2c_driver aw2013_driver = {
> .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(aw2013_match_table),
> },
> .probe = aw2013_probe,
> - .remove = aw2013_remove,
> };
>
> module_i2c_driver(aw2013_driver);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists