linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] pinctrl: qcom: Add SM4450 pinctrl driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6539d781-ecb2-4ffe-9daa-e82ec8d70bea@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 4 Dec 2023 09:14:18 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>, andersson@...nel.org,
        agross@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] pinctrl: qcom: Add SM4450 pinctrl driver

On 04/12/2023 09:06, Tengfei Fan wrote:
> 
> 
> 在 12/4/2023 3:56 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道:
>> On 04/12/2023 02:57, Tengfei Fan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> 在 11/30/2023 7:57 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道:
>>>> On 30/11/2023 03:40, Tengfei Fan wrote:
>>>>> Add pinctrl driver for TLMM block found in SM4450 SoC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Kconfig.msm      |    8 +
>>>>>    drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Makefile         |    1 +
>>>>>    drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm4450.c | 1013 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>    3 files changed, 1022 insertions(+)
>>>>>    create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm4450.c
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hm, was this patch ever built?
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>
>>> This patch has been built before, I will check and compare if there are
>>> any errors and changes when I submitted this patch series.
>>>
>>
>> No, it wasn't built. I just tried - applied it and:
>>
>> pinctrl-sm4450.c:996:19: error: initialization of ‘int (*)(struct
>> platform_device *)’ from incompatible pointer type ‘void (*)(struct
>> platform_device *)’ [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
>>    996 |         .remove = msm_pinctrl_remove,
>>        |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> ../drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm4450.c:996:19: note: (near
>> initialization for ‘sm4450_tlmm_driver.remove’)
>>
>> So you just sent a patch which was not even compiled.
>>
>> NAK.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> I compiled all the related patches together, but I did not compile this 
> patch separately.

We talk about this patch here. Please do not send knowingly wrong code,
because it does not make sense and hurts bisectability.

> The fact that there is a compilation problem is known, but because the 
> patch is already reviewed-by, so a separate patch(patch 3) is submitted 
> to fix the compilation error.

That's not the process. Each patch must be correct. Each.

Best regards,
Krzysztof