[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACGkMEvLpHm+vEB80mc0QdzJkFK5bAt-gH72ypV-oOb7oJvB+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 17:06:56 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: Kunkun Jiang <jiangkunkun@...wei.com>, dongli.zhang@...cle.com,
cohuck@...hat.com, stefanha@...hat.com, mst@...hat.com,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
"open list:IRQCHIP DRIVERS" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
wanghaibin.wang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Support shared VLPI
On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 5:00 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 04 Dec 2023 08:47:49 +0000,
> Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 4:39 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Dec 2, 2023 at 8:20 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Kunkun,
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 08 Nov 2023 09:45:51 +0000,
> > > > Kunkun Jiang <jiangkunkun@...wei.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Marc,
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2023/11/6 23:33, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, 06 Nov 2023 14:59:01 +0000,
> > > > > > Kunkun Jiang <jiangkunkun@...wei.com> wrote:
> > > > > >> The virtio-pci driver write entry1-6
> > > > > >> massage.data in the msix-table and trap to QEMU for processing. The
> > > > > >> massage.data is as follow:
> > > > > >>> entry-0 0
> > > > > >>> entry-1 1
> > > > > >>> entry-2 1
> > > > > >>> entry-3 1
> > > > > >>> entry-4 1
> > > > > >>> entry-5 1
> > > > > >>> entry-6 1
> > >
> > > It looks like a bug from the driver. It should only use vector 0 and 1
> > > in this case.
> > >
> > > Could you please check the queue_msix_vector for each queue in this case?
> >
> > Or did you actually mean queue_msix_vector here? I'm not familiar with
> > ARM but 0 doesn't seem to be a good message.data anyhow.
>
> Why? What's special about 0? 0 is a perfectly fine value.
Ok, looks like I mis-read it as a message.addr. So it's fine.
Thanks
>
> M.
>
> --
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists