linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom,pmic-mpp: clean up example

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 4 Dec 2023 10:48:10 +0100
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom,pmic-mpp: clean up example

On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 01:51:06PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:56 AM Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 08:43:20AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:

> > > This is fine, but I prefer these MFDs have 1 complete example rather
> > > than piecemeal examples for each child device.
> >
> > Yeah, this is not ideal. The closest thing we've got are the examples
> > in:
> >
> >         Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml
> >
> > Are you suggesting eventually dropping the examples from the child node
> > bindings and adding (several) complete examples in the parent one?
> 
> Yes, but if the child nodes are truly reused across multiple PMICs
> then, it is probably a worthwhile exception. There's not a great deal
> of reuse on most MFDs.

Yes, they are indeed reused by multiple PMICs in this case.
 
> > I guess there would need to be more than one if you want to cover all
> > the various child nodes with real examples.
> 
> We don't want examples to be exhaustive permutations of every
> possibility either.

Not every possible permutation but I guess we'd want coverage of all the
various child nodes still (i.e. the child node examples that would have
been removed).

Johan