[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87h6kymgzi.fsf@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2023 10:53:05 +0100
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Mirsad Todorovac <mirsad.todorovac@....unizg.hr>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyrkov@...aro.org>,
Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@...il.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/35] KVM: x86: hyper-v: optimize and cleanup
kvm_hv_process_stimers()
Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com> writes:
> The function traverses stimer_pending_bitmap in a for-loop bit by bit.
> We can do it faster by using atomic find_and_set_bit().
>
> While here, refactor the logic by decreasing indentation level.
>
> CC: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> index 238afd7335e4..a0e45d20d451 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> @@ -870,27 +870,26 @@ void kvm_hv_process_stimers(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> if (!hv_vcpu)
> return;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(hv_vcpu->stimer); i++)
> - if (test_and_clear_bit(i, hv_vcpu->stimer_pending_bitmap)) {
> - stimer = &hv_vcpu->stimer[i];
> - if (stimer->config.enable) {
> - exp_time = stimer->exp_time;
> -
> - if (exp_time) {
> - time_now =
> - get_time_ref_counter(vcpu->kvm);
> - if (time_now >= exp_time)
> - stimer_expiration(stimer);
> - }
> -
> - if ((stimer->config.enable) &&
> - stimer->count) {
> - if (!stimer->msg_pending)
> - stimer_start(stimer);
> - } else
> - stimer_cleanup(stimer);
> - }
> + for_each_test_and_clear_bit(i, hv_vcpu->stimer_pending_bitmap,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(hv_vcpu->stimer)) {
> + stimer = &hv_vcpu->stimer[i];
> + if (!stimer->config.enable)
> + continue;
> +
> + exp_time = stimer->exp_time;
> +
> + if (exp_time) {
> + time_now = get_time_ref_counter(vcpu->kvm);
> + if (time_now >= exp_time)
> + stimer_expiration(stimer);
> }
> +
> + if (stimer->config.enable && stimer->count) {
> + if (!stimer->msg_pending)
> + stimer_start(stimer);
> + } else
> + stimer_cleanup(stimer);
Minor nitpick: it's better (and afair required by coding style) to use
'{}' for both branches here:
if (stimer->config.enable && stimer->count) {
if (!stimer->msg_pending)
stimer_start(stimer);
} else {
stimer_cleanup(stimer);
}
> + }
> }
>
> void kvm_hv_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
--
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists