[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtBcF=sL6O17Vq-zCwqp48LNN46oTG=Drs5=MEh=gbuxPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 10:54:28 +0100
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Qais Yousef <qyousef@...alina.io>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com,
corbet@....net, alexs@...nel.org, siyanteng@...ngson.cn,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
lukasz.luba@....com, hongyan.xia2@....com, yizhou.tang@...pee.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/fair: Simplify util_est
On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 at 00:38, Qais Yousef <qyousef@...alina.io> wrote:
>
> On 12/01/23 17:16, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>
> > /*
> > * The load/runnable/util_avg accumulates an infinite geometric series
> > * (see __update_load_avg_cfs_rq() in kernel/sched/pelt.c).
> > @@ -505,9 +469,20 @@ struct sched_avg {
> > unsigned long load_avg;
> > unsigned long runnable_avg;
> > unsigned long util_avg;
> > - struct util_est util_est;
> > + unsigned int util_est;
> > } ____cacheline_aligned;
>
> unsigned long would be better?
I thought about changing it to unsigned long but I prefered to keep
using the same type as before for the ewma as we don't need to extend
it
Powered by blists - more mailing lists