[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0EFBD0242622180B+20231204022303.528-1-luming.yu@shingroup.cn>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 10:23:01 +0800
From: Luming Yu <luming.yu@...ngroup.cn>
To: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mpe@...erman.id.au, npiggin@...il.com, christophe.leroy@...roup.eu
Cc: luming.yu@...il.com, ke.zhao@...ngroup.cn, dawei.li@...ngroup.cn,
shenghui.qu@...ngroup.cn, Luming Yu <luming.yu@...ngroup.cn>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/locking: implement this_cpu_cmpxchg local API
ppc appears to have already supported cmpxchg-local atomic semantics
that is defined by the kernel convention of the feature.
Add this_cpu_cmpxchg ppc local for the performance benefit of arch
sepcific implementation than asm-generic c verison of the locking API.
Signed-off-by: Luming Yu <luming.yu@...ngroup.cn>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/percpu.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/percpu.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/percpu.h
index 8e5b7d0b851c..ceab5df6e7ab 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/percpu.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/percpu.h
@@ -18,5 +18,22 @@
#include <asm-generic/percpu.h>
#include <asm/paca.h>
+#include <asm/cmpxchg.h>
+#ifdef this_cpu_cmpxchg_1
+#undef this_cpu_cmpxchg_1
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_1(pcp, oval, nval) __cmpxchg_local(raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)), oval, nval, 1)
+#endif
+#ifdef this_cpu_cmpxchg_2
+#undef this_cpu_cmpxchg_2
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_2(pcp, oval, nval) __cmpxchg_local(raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)), oval, nval, 2)
+#endif
+#ifdef this_cpu_cmpxchg_4
+#undef this_cpu_cmpxchg_4
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_4(pcp, oval, nval) __cmpxchg_local(raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)), oval, nval, 4)
+#endif
+#ifdef this_cpu_cmpxchg_8
+#undef this_cpu_cmpxchg_8
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_8(pcp, oval, nval) __cmpxchg_local(raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)), oval, nval, 8)
+#endif
#endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_PERCPU_H_ */
--
2.42.0.windows.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists