Message-ID: <d7978fbf-af12-4787-832f-366b0fddc399@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 Dec 2023 20:32:28 +0800
From:   Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
To:     Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        "Will Deacon" <will@...nel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        "Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        "Jean-Philippe Brucker" <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
        Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
CC:     Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>, <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
        <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/12] iommu: Merge iopf_device_param into
 iommu_fault_param

On 2023/11/15 11:02, Lu Baolu wrote:
> The struct dev_iommu contains two pointers, fault_param and iopf_param.
> The fault_param pointer points to a data structure that is used to store
> pending faults that are awaiting responses. The iopf_param pointer points
> to a data structure that is used to store partial faults that are part of
> a Page Request Group.
> 
> The fault_param and iopf_param pointers are essentially duplicate. This
> causes memory waste. Merge the iopf_device_param pointer into the
> iommu_fault_param pointer to consolidate the code and save memory. The
> consolidated pointer would be allocated on demand when the device driver
> enables the iopf on device, and would be freed after iopf is disabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>
> Tested-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>
> ---
>   include/linux/iommu.h      |  18 ++++--
>   drivers/iommu/io-pgfault.c | 113 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>   drivers/iommu/iommu.c      |  34 ++---------
>   3 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h
> index 79775859af42..108ab50da1ad 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iommu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ struct notifier_block;
>   struct iommu_sva;
>   struct iommu_fault_event;
>   struct iommu_dma_cookie;
> +struct iopf_queue;
>   
>   #define IOMMU_FAULT_PERM_READ	(1 << 0) /* read */
>   #define IOMMU_FAULT_PERM_WRITE	(1 << 1) /* write */
> @@ -590,21 +591,31 @@ struct iommu_fault_event {
>    * struct iommu_fault_param - per-device IOMMU fault data
>    * @handler: Callback function to handle IOMMU faults at device level
>    * @data: handler private data
> - * @faults: holds the pending faults which needs response
>    * @lock: protect pending faults list
> + * @dev: the device that owns this param
> + * @queue: IOPF queue
> + * @queue_list: index into queue->devices
> + * @partial: faults that are part of a Page Request Group for which the last
> + *           request hasn't been submitted yet.
> + * @faults: holds the pending faults which needs response

since you already moved this line, maybe fix this typo as well.
s/needs/need/

>    */
>   struct iommu_fault_param {
>   	iommu_dev_fault_handler_t handler;
>   	void *data;
> +	struct mutex lock;

can you share why move this line up? It results in a line move as well
in the above kdoc.

> +
> +	struct device *dev;
> +	struct iopf_queue *queue;
> +	struct list_head queue_list;
> +
> +	struct list_head partial;
>   	struct list_head faults;
> -	struct mutex lock;
>   };
>   
>   /**
>    * struct dev_iommu - Collection of per-device IOMMU data
>    *
>    * @fault_param: IOMMU detected device fault reporting data
> - * @iopf_param:	 I/O Page Fault queue and data
>    * @fwspec:	 IOMMU fwspec data
>    * @iommu_dev:	 IOMMU device this device is linked to
>    * @priv:	 IOMMU Driver private data
> @@ -620,7 +631,6 @@ struct iommu_fault_param {
>   struct dev_iommu {
>   	struct mutex lock;
>   	struct iommu_fault_param	*fault_param;
> -	struct iopf_device_param	*iopf_param;
>   	struct iommu_fwspec		*fwspec;
>   	struct iommu_device		*iommu_dev;
>   	void				*priv;
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgfault.c b/drivers/iommu/io-pgfault.c
> index 24b5545352ae..b1cf28055525 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgfault.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgfault.c
> @@ -25,21 +25,6 @@ struct iopf_queue {
>   	struct mutex			lock;
>   };
>   
> -/**
> - * struct iopf_device_param - IO Page Fault data attached to a device
> - * @dev: the device that owns this param
> - * @queue: IOPF queue
> - * @queue_list: index into queue->devices
> - * @partial: faults that are part of a Page Request Group for which the last
> - *           request hasn't been submitted yet.
> - */
> -struct iopf_device_param {
> -	struct device			*dev;
> -	struct iopf_queue		*queue;
> -	struct list_head		queue_list;
> -	struct list_head		partial;
> -};
> -
>   struct iopf_fault {
>   	struct iommu_fault		fault;
>   	struct list_head		list;
> @@ -144,7 +129,7 @@ int iommu_queue_iopf(struct iommu_fault *fault, void *cookie)
>   	int ret;
>   	struct iopf_group *group;
>   	struct iopf_fault *iopf, *next;
> -	struct iopf_device_param *iopf_param;
> +	struct iommu_fault_param *iopf_param;
>   
>   	struct device *dev = cookie;
>   	struct dev_iommu *param = dev->iommu;
> @@ -159,7 +144,7 @@ int iommu_queue_iopf(struct iommu_fault *fault, void *cookie)
>   	 * As long as we're holding param->lock, the queue can't be unlinked
>   	 * from the device and therefore cannot disappear.
>   	 */
> -	iopf_param = param->iopf_param;
> +	iopf_param = param->fault_param;
>   	if (!iopf_param)
>   		return -ENODEV;
>   
> @@ -229,14 +214,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_queue_iopf);
>   int iopf_queue_flush_dev(struct device *dev)
>   {
>   	int ret = 0;
> -	struct iopf_device_param *iopf_param;
> +	struct iommu_fault_param *iopf_param;
>   	struct dev_iommu *param = dev->iommu;
>   
>   	if (!param)
>   		return -ENODEV;
>   
>   	mutex_lock(&param->lock);
> -	iopf_param = param->iopf_param;
> +	iopf_param = param->fault_param;
>   	if (iopf_param)
>   		flush_workqueue(iopf_param->queue->wq);
>   	else
> @@ -260,7 +245,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iopf_queue_flush_dev);
>   int iopf_queue_discard_partial(struct iopf_queue *queue)
>   {
>   	struct iopf_fault *iopf, *next;
> -	struct iopf_device_param *iopf_param;
> +	struct iommu_fault_param *iopf_param;
>   
>   	if (!queue)
>   		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -287,34 +272,38 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iopf_queue_discard_partial);
>    */
>   int iopf_queue_add_device(struct iopf_queue *queue, struct device *dev)
>   {
> -	int ret = -EBUSY;
> -	struct iopf_device_param *iopf_param;
> +	int ret = 0;
>   	struct dev_iommu *param = dev->iommu;
> -
> -	if (!param)
> -		return -ENODEV;
> -
> -	iopf_param = kzalloc(sizeof(*iopf_param), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!iopf_param)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> -
> -	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&iopf_param->partial);
> -	iopf_param->queue = queue;
> -	iopf_param->dev = dev;
> +	struct iommu_fault_param *fault_param;
>   
>   	mutex_lock(&queue->lock);
>   	mutex_lock(&param->lock);
> -	if (!param->iopf_param) {
> -		list_add(&iopf_param->queue_list, &queue->devices);
> -		param->iopf_param = iopf_param;
> -		ret = 0;
> +	if (param->fault_param) {
> +		ret = -EBUSY;
> +		goto done_unlock;
>   	}
> +
> +	get_device(dev);

noticed the old code has this get as well. :) but still want to ask if
it is really need.

> +	fault_param = kzalloc(sizeof(*fault_param), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!fault_param) {
> +		put_device(dev);
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto done_unlock;
> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_init(&fault_param->lock);
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fault_param->faults);
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fault_param->partial);
> +	fault_param->dev = dev;
> +	list_add(&fault_param->queue_list, &queue->devices);
> +	fault_param->queue = queue;
> +
> +	param->fault_param = fault_param;
> +
> +done_unlock:
>   	mutex_unlock(&param->lock);
>   	mutex_unlock(&queue->lock);
>   
> -	if (ret)
> -		kfree(iopf_param);
> -
>   	return ret;
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iopf_queue_add_device);
> @@ -330,34 +319,42 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iopf_queue_add_device);
>    */
>   int iopf_queue_remove_device(struct iopf_queue *queue, struct device *dev)
>   {
> -	int ret = -EINVAL;
> +	int ret = 0;
>   	struct iopf_fault *iopf, *next;
> -	struct iopf_device_param *iopf_param;
>   	struct dev_iommu *param = dev->iommu;
> -
> -	if (!param || !queue)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +	struct iommu_fault_param *fault_param = param->fault_param;
>   
>   	mutex_lock(&queue->lock);
>   	mutex_lock(&param->lock);
> -	iopf_param = param->iopf_param;
> -	if (iopf_param && iopf_param->queue == queue) {
> -		list_del(&iopf_param->queue_list);
> -		param->iopf_param = NULL;
> -		ret = 0;
> +	if (!fault_param) {
> +		ret = -ENODEV;
> +		goto unlock;
>   	}
> -	mutex_unlock(&param->lock);
> -	mutex_unlock(&queue->lock);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> +
> +	if (fault_param->queue != queue) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto unlock;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!list_empty(&fault_param->faults)) {
> +		ret = -EBUSY;
> +		goto unlock;
> +	}
> +
> +	list_del(&fault_param->queue_list);
>   
>   	/* Just in case some faults are still stuck */
> -	list_for_each_entry_safe(iopf, next, &iopf_param->partial, list)
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(iopf, next, &fault_param->partial, list)
>   		kfree(iopf);
>   
> -	kfree(iopf_param);
> +	param->fault_param = NULL;
> +	kfree(fault_param);
> +	put_device(dev);
> +unlock:
> +	mutex_unlock(&param->lock);
> +	mutex_unlock(&queue->lock);
>   
> -	return 0;
> +	return ret;
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iopf_queue_remove_device);
>   
> @@ -403,7 +400,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iopf_queue_alloc);
>    */
>   void iopf_queue_free(struct iopf_queue *queue)
>   {
> -	struct iopf_device_param *iopf_param, *next;
> +	struct iommu_fault_param *iopf_param, *next;
>   
>   	if (!queue)
>   		return;
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index f24513e2b025..9c9eacfa6761 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -1326,27 +1326,18 @@ int iommu_register_device_fault_handler(struct device *dev,
>   	struct dev_iommu *param = dev->iommu;
>   	int ret = 0;
>   
> -	if (!param)
> +	if (!param || !param->fault_param)
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
>   	mutex_lock(&param->lock);
>   	/* Only allow one fault handler registered for each device */
> -	if (param->fault_param) {
> +	if (param->fault_param->handler) {
>   		ret = -EBUSY;
>   		goto done_unlock;
>   	}
>   
> -	get_device(dev);
> -	param->fault_param = kzalloc(sizeof(*param->fault_param), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!param->fault_param) {
> -		put_device(dev);
> -		ret = -ENOMEM;
> -		goto done_unlock;
> -	}
>   	param->fault_param->handler = handler;
>   	param->fault_param->data = data;
> -	mutex_init(&param->fault_param->lock);
> -	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&param->fault_param->faults);
>   
>   done_unlock:
>   	mutex_unlock(&param->lock);
> @@ -1367,29 +1358,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_register_device_fault_handler);
>   int iommu_unregister_device_fault_handler(struct device *dev)
>   {
>   	struct dev_iommu *param = dev->iommu;
> -	int ret = 0;
>   
> -	if (!param)
> +	if (!param || !param->fault_param)
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
>   	mutex_lock(&param->lock);
> -
> -	if (!param->fault_param)
> -		goto unlock;
> -
> -	/* we cannot unregister handler if there are pending faults */
> -	if (!list_empty(&param->fault_param->faults)) {
> -		ret = -EBUSY;
> -		goto unlock;
> -	}
> -
> -	kfree(param->fault_param);
> -	param->fault_param = NULL;
> -	put_device(dev);
> -unlock:
> +	param->fault_param->handler = NULL;
> +	param->fault_param->data = NULL;
>   	mutex_unlock(&param->lock);
>   
> -	return ret;
> +	return 0;
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_unregister_device_fault_handler);
>   

-- 
Regards,
Yi Liu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists