lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 4 Dec 2023 14:59:58 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
        Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
        Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] checkpatch: Add dev_err_probe() to the list of
 Log Functions

On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 02:29:57PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 19:07 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Currently the [style] behaviour is
> > inconsistent independently on somebody's preferences...
> 
> <shrug>  Which is IMO perfectly fine.
> 
> The ratio of multiple line and single line uses
> of dev_err_probe is ~50:50
> 
> $ git grep -w dev_err_probe | grep -P ';\s*$' | wc -l
> 1532
> $ git grep -w dev_err_probe | grep -P ',\s*$' | wc -l
> 1871

My point is that checkpatch won't warn on dev_err(..., "very long line\n");
while doing the same on dev_err_probe() even if the line is shorter than in
dev_err() case. This inconsistency I am talking about.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ