| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20231204133032.GA1469867@fedora>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 08:30:32 -0500
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Suwan Kim <suwan.kim027@...il.com>,
oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@...dia.com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>, pbonzini@...hat.com
Subject: Re: drivers/block/virtio_blk.c:570:68: warning: '%d' directive
output may be truncated writing between 1 and 11 bytes into a region of size
7
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 04:02:07AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 04:56:35PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > head: 33cc938e65a98f1d29d0a18403dbbee050dcad9a
> > commit: 4e0400525691d0e676dbe002641f9a61261f1e1b virtio-blk: support polling I/O
> > date: 1 year, 6 months ago
> > config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-006-20230906 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231204/202312041509.DIyvEt9h-lkp@intel.com/config)
> > compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
> > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231204/202312041509.DIyvEt9h-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> >
> > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312041509.DIyvEt9h-lkp@intel.com/
> >
> > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> > drivers/block/virtio_blk.c: In function 'init_vq':
> > >> drivers/block/virtio_blk.c:570:68: warning: '%d' directive output may be truncated writing between 1 and 11 bytes into a region of size 7 [-Wformat-truncation=]
> > 570 | snprintf(vblk->vqs[i].name, VQ_NAME_LEN, "req_poll.%d", i);
> > | ^~
> > drivers/block/virtio_blk.c:570:58: note: directive argument in the range [-2147483648, 65534]
> > 570 | snprintf(vblk->vqs[i].name, VQ_NAME_LEN, "req_poll.%d", i);
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > drivers/block/virtio_blk.c:570:17: note: 'snprintf' output between 11 and 21 bytes into a destination of size 16
> > 570 | snprintf(vblk->vqs[i].name, VQ_NAME_LEN, "req_poll.%d", i);
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> >
> > vim +570 drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> >
> > 511
> > 512 static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk)
> > 513 {
> > 514 int err;
> > 515 int i;
> > 516 vq_callback_t **callbacks;
> > 517 const char **names;
> > 518 struct virtqueue **vqs;
> > 519 unsigned short num_vqs;
> > 520 unsigned int num_poll_vqs;
> > 521 struct virtio_device *vdev = vblk->vdev;
> > 522 struct irq_affinity desc = { 0, };
> > 523
> > 524 err = virtio_cread_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ,
> > 525 struct virtio_blk_config, num_queues,
> > 526 &num_vqs);
> > 527 if (err)
> > 528 num_vqs = 1;
> > 529
> > 530 if (!err && !num_vqs) {
> > 531 dev_err(&vdev->dev, "MQ advertised but zero queues reported\n");
> > 532 return -EINVAL;
> > 533 }
> > 534
> > 535 num_vqs = min_t(unsigned int,
> > 536 min_not_zero(num_request_queues, nr_cpu_ids),
> > 537 num_vqs);
> > 538
> > 539 num_poll_vqs = min_t(unsigned int, poll_queues, num_vqs - 1);
> > 540
> > 541 vblk->io_queues[HCTX_TYPE_DEFAULT] = num_vqs - num_poll_vqs;
> > 542 vblk->io_queues[HCTX_TYPE_READ] = 0;
> > 543 vblk->io_queues[HCTX_TYPE_POLL] = num_poll_vqs;
> > 544
> > 545 dev_info(&vdev->dev, "%d/%d/%d default/read/poll queues\n",
> > 546 vblk->io_queues[HCTX_TYPE_DEFAULT],
> > 547 vblk->io_queues[HCTX_TYPE_READ],
> > 548 vblk->io_queues[HCTX_TYPE_POLL]);
> > 549
> > 550 vblk->vqs = kmalloc_array(num_vqs, sizeof(*vblk->vqs), GFP_KERNEL);
> > 551 if (!vblk->vqs)
> > 552 return -ENOMEM;
> > 553
> > 554 names = kmalloc_array(num_vqs, sizeof(*names), GFP_KERNEL);
> > 555 callbacks = kmalloc_array(num_vqs, sizeof(*callbacks), GFP_KERNEL);
> > 556 vqs = kmalloc_array(num_vqs, sizeof(*vqs), GFP_KERNEL);
> > 557 if (!names || !callbacks || !vqs) {
> > 558 err = -ENOMEM;
> > 559 goto out;
> > 560 }
> > 561
> > 562 for (i = 0; i < num_vqs - num_poll_vqs; i++) {
> > 563 callbacks[i] = virtblk_done;
> > 564 snprintf(vblk->vqs[i].name, VQ_NAME_LEN, "req.%d", i);
> > 565 names[i] = vblk->vqs[i].name;
> > 566 }
> > 567
> > 568 for (; i < num_vqs; i++) {
> > 569 callbacks[i] = NULL;
> > > 570 snprintf(vblk->vqs[i].name, VQ_NAME_LEN, "req_poll.%d", i);
> > 571 names[i] = vblk->vqs[i].name;
> > 572 }
> > 573
> > 574 /* Discover virtqueues and write information to configuration. */
> > 575 err = virtio_find_vqs(vdev, num_vqs, vqs, callbacks, names, &desc);
> > 576 if (err)
> > 577 goto out;
> > 578
> > 579 for (i = 0; i < num_vqs; i++) {
> > 580 spin_lock_init(&vblk->vqs[i].lock);
> > 581 vblk->vqs[i].vq = vqs[i];
> > 582 }
> > 583 vblk->num_vqs = num_vqs;
> > 584
> > 585 out:
> > 586 kfree(vqs);
> > 587 kfree(callbacks);
> > 588 kfree(names);
> > 589 if (err)
> > 590 kfree(vblk->vqs);
> > 591 return err;
> > 592 }
> > 593
> >
> > --
> > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> > https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
>
> Stefan, Paolo,
> It's a false positive but do we want to fix it? Make i unsigned?
It's a false positive:
That maximum number of virtqueues is 65535. That's 5 characters. The
maximum value of num_poll_vqs is actually 65534 because it's capped at
num_vqs - 1.
The warning reveals that the analysis thinks i can be negative:
drivers/block/virtio_blk.c:570:58: note: directive argument in the range [-2147483648, 65534]
It can't because of num_poll_vqs = min_t(unsigned int, poll_queues,
num_vqs - 1).
VQ_NAME_LEN is 16, so 9 bytes are used for "req_poll." and the NUL
terminator:
snprintf(vblk->vqs[i].name, VQ_NAME_LEN, "req_poll.%d", i);
9 + 5 = 14 is always less than VQ_NAME_LEN (16), so it looks like a
false positive.
That said, it's still worth cleaning up the types because they are
inconsistent:
unsigned short num_vqs;
unsigned int num_poll_vqs;
and using "%d" for an unsigned value also contributes to the problem.
I'll send a patch.
Stefan
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists