linux-kernel - [PATCH RFC 26/39] mm/khugepaged: page_remove_rmap() -> folio_remove_rmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231204142146.91437-27-david@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon,  4 Dec 2023 15:21:33 +0100
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
        Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@...el.com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 26/39] mm/khugepaged: page_remove_rmap() -> folio_remove_rmap_pte()

Let's convert __collapse_huge_page_copy_succeeded() and
collapse_pte_mapped_thp(). While at it, perform some more folio
conversion in __collapse_huge_page_copy_succeeded().

We can get rid of release_pte_page().

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
---
 mm/khugepaged.c | 17 +++++++----------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
index 064654717843e..c2d7438fac22d 100644
--- a/mm/khugepaged.c
+++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
@@ -493,11 +493,6 @@ static void release_pte_folio(struct folio *folio)
 	folio_putback_lru(folio);
 }
 
-static void release_pte_page(struct page *page)
-{
-	release_pte_folio(page_folio(page));
-}
-
 static void release_pte_pages(pte_t *pte, pte_t *_pte,
 		struct list_head *compound_pagelist)
 {
@@ -686,6 +681,7 @@ static void __collapse_huge_page_copy_succeeded(pte_t *pte,
 						spinlock_t *ptl,
 						struct list_head *compound_pagelist)
 {
+	struct folio *src_folio;
 	struct page *src_page;
 	struct page *tmp;
 	pte_t *_pte;
@@ -707,16 +703,17 @@ static void __collapse_huge_page_copy_succeeded(pte_t *pte,
 			}
 		} else {
 			src_page = pte_page(pteval);
-			if (!PageCompound(src_page))
-				release_pte_page(src_page);
+			src_folio = page_folio(src_page);
+			if (!folio_test_large(src_folio))
+				release_pte_folio(src_folio);
 			/*
 			 * ptl mostly unnecessary, but preempt has to
 			 * be disabled to update the per-cpu stats
-			 * inside page_remove_rmap().
+			 * inside folio_remove_rmap_pte().
 			 */
 			spin_lock(ptl);
 			ptep_clear(vma->vm_mm, address, _pte);
-			page_remove_rmap(src_page, vma, false);
+			folio_remove_rmap_pte(src_folio, src_page, vma);
 			spin_unlock(ptl);
 			free_page_and_swap_cache(src_page);
 		}
@@ -1619,7 +1616,7 @@ int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
 		 * PTE dirty? Shmem page is already dirty; file is read-only.
 		 */
 		ptep_clear(mm, addr, pte);
-		page_remove_rmap(page, vma, false);
+		folio_remove_rmap_pte(folio, page, vma);
 		nr_ptes++;
 	}
 
-- 
2.41.0