[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH5fLgh4S3ByyYp_FohkovMsBPXo6S-0VzowWMFhQBUDNMgTLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 15:23:53 +0100
From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
To: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@...gle.com>
Cc: arve@...roid.com, brauner@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
joel@...lfernandes.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, maco@...roid.com, surenb@...gle.com,
tkjos@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/28] binder: do unlocked work in binder_alloc_new_buf()
On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 3:22 PM Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 11:57:04AM +0000, 'Alice Ryhl' via kernel-team wrote:
> > You could also write this as:
> >
> > if (!IS_ERR(buffer)) {
> > buffer->data_size = data_size;
> > buffer->offsets_size = offsets_size;
> > buffer->extra_buffers_size = extra_buffers_size;
> > }
> >
> > mutex_unlock(&alloc->mutex);
> > return buffer;
>
> There is a subsequent patch that adds more work after this and makes the
> goto statement a better fit (patch 19/28)... at least IMO.
Ah, ok. SGTM!
Alice
Powered by blists - more mailing lists