linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 11/28] binder: do unlocked work in binder_alloc_new

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 4 Dec 2023 15:23:53 +0100
From:   Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
To:     Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@...gle.com>
Cc:     arve@...roid.com, brauner@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        joel@...lfernandes.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, maco@...roid.com, surenb@...gle.com,
        tkjos@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/28] binder: do unlocked work in binder_alloc_new_buf()

On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 3:22 PM Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 11:57:04AM +0000, 'Alice Ryhl' via kernel-team wrote:
> > You could also write this as:
> >
> >       if (!IS_ERR(buffer)) {
> >               buffer->data_size = data_size;
> >               buffer->offsets_size = offsets_size;
> >               buffer->extra_buffers_size = extra_buffers_size;
> >       }
> >
> >       mutex_unlock(&alloc->mutex);
> >       return buffer;
>
> There is a subsequent patch that adds more work after this and makes the
> goto statement a better fit (patch 19/28)... at least IMO.

Ah, ok. SGTM!

Alice