[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <adbe5299-de4a-4ac1-90d0-f7ae537287d0@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 15:54:04 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
David Epping <david.epping@...singlinkelectronics.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@....com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v3 3/3] net: phy: add support for PHY package
MMD read/write
> > I tend to agree. These functions should be documented once in kdoc,
> > and only once. I don't really care if its in the header, or the C
> > code, but not both.
> >
>
> Ok just to make sure, I should keep the kdoc in the .c and drop them in
> .h ? (or should I move the more complete kdoc in .c to .h and remove
> kdoc in .c?)
Please put the kdoc in the header file and remove if from the .c file.
Thanks
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists