linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/coco, x86/sev: Use cpu_feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231205150648.GDZW88iAjBzYoIJ0+o@fat_crate.local>
Date:   Tue, 5 Dec 2023 16:06:48 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/coco, x86/sev: Use cpu_feature_enabled() to detect
 SEV guest flavor

On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 06:00:12PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> I don't think cc_platform_has() is the right check. On TDX side we use
> X86_FEATURE_TDX_GUEST for this and it works better than stretching
> CC_ATTRs beyond their meaning.

You don't think it is the right check because you do something else on
Intel?

I can't follow that argument.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette