linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] wifi: ath11k: Use DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() for ath11k_htc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87edg0pt17.fsf@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 05 Dec 2023 17:29:08 +0200
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To:     Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>
Cc:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        <ath10k@...ts.infradead.org>, <ath11k@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] wifi: ath11k: Use DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() for
 ath11k_htc_record

Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com> writes:

> On 11/27/2023 8:23 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>
>> 
>> 
>> On 11/27/23 10:14, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>>> Transform the zero-length array in ath11k_htc_record into a proper
>>> flexible array via the DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() macro. This helps with
>>> ongoing efforts to globally enable -Warray-bounds.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/htc.h | 2 +-
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/htc.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/htc.h
>>> index 84971cc9251c..e0434b29df70 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/htc.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/htc.h
>>> @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ struct ath11k_htc_credit_report {
>>>   struct ath11k_htc_record {
>>>   	struct ath11k_htc_record_hdr hdr;
>>>   	union {
>>> -		struct ath11k_htc_credit_report credit_report[0];
>>> +		DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct ath11k_htc_credit_report, credit_report);
>>>   	};
>> 
>> Why not removing the `union` and just do a direct transformation [0] -> [ ] ?
>
> No reason other than staying consistent with ath10k.
> Will see if Kalle has an opinion on this.

Yeah, I don't see the need for the union and I removed it in the pending
branch:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git/commit/?h=pending&id=a2faeea1fe0635563187e7821a6d0baf7b40f2c6

Does it look ok?

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches