linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] selftests: livepatch: Test livepatching a heavily called syscall

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <76c4b967-1cb6-4f77-9402-f835b15adb10@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 5 Dec 2023 08:39:23 -0700
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     mpdesouza@...e.com, Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@...e.de>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] selftests: livepatch: Test livepatching a heavily
 called syscall

On 12/5/23 05:52, mpdesouza@...e.com wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 16:38 +0000, Shuah Khan wrote:

> 0003-selftests-livepatch-Test-livepatching-a-heavily-call.patch has
> style problems, please review.
> 
> NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
>        them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
> 
> I couldn't find any mention about "missing module name". Is your script
> showing more warnings than these ones? Can you please share your
> output?
> 
> I'll fix MAINTAINERS file but I'll wait until I understand what's
> missing in your checkpatch script to resend the patchset.
> 

Looks like it is coming a script - still my question stands on
whether or not you would need a module name for this module?

I am not too concerned about MAINTAINERS file warns.

I am assuming you will be sending a new version to address
Joe Lawrence's comments?

thanks,
-- Shuah