[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <72bb44a8-dbe6-4fdd-921a-b9fcf798fe3c@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 09:22:11 -0600
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>, broonie@...nel.org,
peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com, yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com,
kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com, cezary.rojewski@...el.com,
ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: sof_sdw_cs_amp: Connect outputs to a speaker
widget
On 12/5/23 07:50, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> Hookup the CS35L56 DAPM_OUTPUT widgets to a DAPM_SPK widget so
> that there is a complete logical path to a speaker.
>
> There is no particular reason to use multiple speaker widgets.
> The CS35L56 are designed to work together as a set so they have
> all been connected to a single speaker widget.
>
> Instead of a hardcoded list of codec widget names, the code walks
> through all the codecs on the dailink and for every cs35l56 it uses
> its name prefix to construct the source end of the route. This adds
> a small amount of overhead during probe but has the benefit that it
> isn't dependent on every system using the same prefixes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Acked-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
We should probably do the same thing for sof_sdw_rt_map.c, there's no
good reason to encode rt1316-2 SPOL and rt1318-2 SPOR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists