[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231205-outnumber-yelp-dafb6ace186e@spud>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 16:41:35 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-fsd@...la.com,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] dt-bindings: samsung: continued - add specific
compatibles for Tesla FSD Hi,
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 10:22:23AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Merging
> =======
> I propose to take entire patchset through my tree (Samsung SoC), because:
> 1. I already took similar work this cycle:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/169997520487.6747.17671551558724027958.b4-ty@linaro.org/
> 2. Two new SoCs are coming (Google GS101 and ExynosAutov920) and they might
> touch the same lines. It is reasonable for me to take the bindings for the new
> SoCs, to have clean `make dtbs_check` on the new DTS.
> 3. Having it together helps me to have clean `make dtbs_check` within my tree
> on the existing DTS.
> 4. No drivers are affected by this change.
>
> If folks agree, please kindly Ack the patches.
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Cheers,
Conor.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists