linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] dt-bindings: samsung: continued - add specific compatibles for Tesla FSD Hi,

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 5 Dec 2023 16:41:35 +0000
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-fsd@...la.com,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] dt-bindings: samsung: continued - add specific
 compatibles for Tesla FSD Hi,

On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 10:22:23AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Merging
> =======
> I propose to take entire patchset through my tree (Samsung SoC), because:
> 1. I already took similar work this cycle:
>    https://lore.kernel.org/all/169997520487.6747.17671551558724027958.b4-ty@linaro.org/
> 2. Two new SoCs are coming (Google GS101 and ExynosAutov920) and they might
>    touch the same lines.  It is reasonable for me to take the bindings for the new
>    SoCs, to have clean `make dtbs_check` on the new DTS.
> 3. Having it together helps me to have clean `make dtbs_check` within my tree
>    on the existing DTS.
> 4. No drivers are affected by this change.
> 
> If folks agree, please kindly Ack the patches.

Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>

Cheers,
Conor.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)