lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6863B74199951BD2+ZW6DIO1n0phYBjg9@centos8>
Date:   Tue, 5 Dec 2023 09:55:44 +0800
From:   Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ngroup.cn>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, jszhang@...nel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-serial <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        set_pte_at@...look.com, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: dw8250: Make DLF feature independent of
 ADDITIONAL_FEATURE

Hi Ilpo, Andy,

On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 03:29:35PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 03:20:09PM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Dec 2023, Dawei Li wrote:
> > 
> > > DW apb uart databook defines couples of configuration parameters of
> 
> DW_apb_uart (as it's part of file name, or spell this fully).
> 
> > > dw8250 IP, among which there are 2 of them:
> 
> DesignWare 8250 IP
> 
> ..
> 
> > > The bug was hit when we are bringing up dw8250 IP on our hardware
> 
> Ditto.
> 
> > > platform, in which parameters are configured in such combination:
> > > - ADDTIONAL_FEATURE disabled;
> > > - FRACTIONAL_BAUD_DIVISOR_EN enabled;
> 
> ..
> 
> > The very same code change is already in tty-next (from another author).
> 
> For your convenience:
> 
> d804987153e7 ("serial: 8250_dw: Decouple DLF register check from UCV")

[sigh]

Apparently I thought tty/for-linus is the "bug fixing" branch for tty by
mistake, and didn't realize the same fix patch has been landed in tty-next
for a while.

Thanks for the update.

Anyway, I believe the fixing patch should cc stable and be getting backported?
I hit the bug on 5.10.x, it's possible the bug has been there before that.

Thanks,
   dawei

> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
> 
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ