linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/134] 6.6.5-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20231205171041.2242-1-sj@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue,  5 Dec 2023 17:10:41 +0000
From:   SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
        conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com, damon@...ts.linux.dev,
        SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/134] 6.6.5-rc1 review

Hello,

On 2023-12-05T12:14:32+09:00 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.5 release.
> There are 134 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Dec 2023 03:14:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.5-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.

This rc kernel passes DAMON functionality test[1] on my test machine.
Attaching the test results summary below.  Please note that I retrieved the
kernel from linux-stable-rc tree[2].

Tested-by: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>

[1] https://github.com/awslabs/damon-tests/tree/next/corr
[2] b0b05ccdd77d ("Linux 6.6.5-rc1")

Thanks,
SJ

[...]

---

ok 1 selftests: damon: debugfs_attrs.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon: debugfs_schemes.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon: debugfs_target_ids.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon: debugfs_empty_targets.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon: debugfs_huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon: debugfs_duplicate_context_creation.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon: debugfs_rm_non_contexts.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon: sysfs.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon: sysfs_update_removed_scheme_dir.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon: reclaim.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon: lru_sort.sh
ok 1 selftests: damon-tests: kunit.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon-tests: huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon-tests: buffer_overflow.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon-tests: rm_contexts.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon-tests: record_null_deref.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon-tests: damo_tests.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon-tests: masim-record.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon-tests: build_arm64.sh
ok 12 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_idle_flag.sh
ok 13 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_highpte.sh
ok 14 selftests: damon-tests: build_nomemcg.sh
 [33m
 [92mPASS [39m