[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231205022418.1703007-10-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 02:24:01 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Cc: gus Gusenleitner Klaus <gus@...a.com>,
Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"dsahern@...nel.org" <dsahern@...nel.org>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/9] ext4: don't access the source subdirectory content on same-directory rename
We can't really afford locking the source on same-directory rename;
currently vfs_rename() tries to do that, but it will have to be changed.
The logics in ext4 is lazy and goes looking for ".." in source even in
same-directory case. It's not hard to get rid of that, leaving that
behaviour only for cross-directory case; that VFS can get locks safely
(and will keep doing that after the coming changes).
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
---
fs/ext4/namei.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c
index d252935f9c8a..467ba47a691c 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/namei.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c
@@ -3591,10 +3591,14 @@ struct ext4_renament {
int dir_inlined;
};
-static int ext4_rename_dir_prepare(handle_t *handle, struct ext4_renament *ent)
+static int ext4_rename_dir_prepare(handle_t *handle, struct ext4_renament *ent, bool is_cross)
{
int retval;
+ ent->is_dir = true;
+ if (!is_cross)
+ return 0;
+
ent->dir_bh = ext4_get_first_dir_block(handle, ent->inode,
&retval, &ent->parent_de,
&ent->dir_inlined);
@@ -3612,6 +3616,9 @@ static int ext4_rename_dir_finish(handle_t *handle, struct ext4_renament *ent,
{
int retval;
+ if (!ent->dir_bh)
+ return 0;
+
ent->parent_de->inode = cpu_to_le32(dir_ino);
BUFFER_TRACE(ent->dir_bh, "call ext4_handle_dirty_metadata");
if (!ent->dir_inlined) {
@@ -3900,7 +3907,7 @@ static int ext4_rename(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *old_dir,
if (new.dir != old.dir && EXT4_DIR_LINK_MAX(new.dir))
goto end_rename;
}
- retval = ext4_rename_dir_prepare(handle, &old);
+ retval = ext4_rename_dir_prepare(handle, &old, new.dir != old.dir);
if (retval)
goto end_rename;
}
@@ -3964,7 +3971,7 @@ static int ext4_rename(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *old_dir,
}
inode_set_mtime_to_ts(old.dir, inode_set_ctime_current(old.dir));
ext4_update_dx_flag(old.dir);
- if (old.dir_bh) {
+ if (old.is_dir) {
retval = ext4_rename_dir_finish(handle, &old, new.dir->i_ino);
if (retval)
goto end_rename;
@@ -3987,7 +3994,7 @@ static int ext4_rename(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *old_dir,
if (unlikely(retval))
goto end_rename;
- if (S_ISDIR(old.inode->i_mode)) {
+ if (old.is_dir) {
/*
* We disable fast commits here that's because the
* replay code is not yet capable of changing dot dot
@@ -4114,14 +4121,12 @@ static int ext4_cross_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
ext4_handle_sync(handle);
if (S_ISDIR(old.inode->i_mode)) {
- old.is_dir = true;
- retval = ext4_rename_dir_prepare(handle, &old);
+ retval = ext4_rename_dir_prepare(handle, &old, new.dir != old.dir);
if (retval)
goto end_rename;
}
if (S_ISDIR(new.inode->i_mode)) {
- new.is_dir = true;
- retval = ext4_rename_dir_prepare(handle, &new);
+ retval = ext4_rename_dir_prepare(handle, &new, new.dir != old.dir);
if (retval)
goto end_rename;
}
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists