linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with the perf-current tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231206100230.7d29859d@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Wed, 6 Dec 2023 10:02:30 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with the
 perf-current tree

Hi all,

On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 11:10:05 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the security tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   tools/perf/arch/s390/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   d3968c974a24 ("tools/perf: Update tools's copy of s390 syscall table")
> 
> from the perf-current tree and commit:
> 
>   5f42375904b0 ("LSM: wireup Linux Security Module syscalls")
> 
> from the security tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc tools/perf/arch/s390/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> index 86fec9b080f6,5a422443cb16..000000000000
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/s390/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/s390/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> @@@ -455,7 -455,6 +455,10 @@@
>   450  common	set_mempolicy_home_node	sys_set_mempolicy_home_node	sys_set_mempolicy_home_node
>   451  common	cachestat		sys_cachestat			sys_cachestat
>   452  common	fchmodat2		sys_fchmodat2			sys_fchmodat2
>  -453  common	lsm_get_self_attr	sys_lsm_get_self_attr	sys_lsm_get_self_attr
>  -454  common	lsm_set_self_attr	sys_lsm_set_self_attr	sys_lsm_set_self_attr
>  -455  common	lsm_list_modules	sys_lsm_list_modules	sys_lsm_list_modules
>  +453  common	map_shadow_stack	sys_map_shadow_stack		sys_map_shadow_stack
>  +454  common	futex_wake		sys_futex_wake			sys_futex_wake
>  +455  common	futex_wait		sys_futex_wait			sys_futex_wait
>  +456  common	futex_requeue		sys_futex_requeue		sys_futex_requeue
> ++459  common	lsm_get_self_attr	sys_lsm_get_self_attr	sys_lsm_get_self_attr
> ++460  common	lsm_set_self_attr	sys_lsm_set_self_attr	sys_lsm_set_self_attr
> ++461  common	lsm_list_modules	sys_lsm_list_modules	sys_lsm_list_modules

This is now a conflict between the security tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped