[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231205064806.2851305-2-avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 09:48:03 +0300
From: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...utedevices.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>
CC: <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<kernel@...rdevices.ru>, <oxffffaa@...il.com>,
<avkrasnov@...utedevices.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v6 1/4] vsock: update SO_RCVLOWAT setting callback
Do not return if transport callback for SO_RCVLOWAT is set (only in
error case). In this case we don't need to set 'sk_rcvlowat' field in
each transport - only in 'vsock_set_rcvlowat()'. Also, if 'sk_rcvlowat'
is now set only in af_vsock.c, change callback name from 'set_rcvlowat'
to 'notify_set_rcvlowat'.
Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...utedevices.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
---
Changelog:
v3 -> v4:
* Rename 'set_rcvlowat' to 'notify_set_rcvlowat'.
* Commit message updated.
include/net/af_vsock.h | 2 +-
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 9 +++++++--
net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/af_vsock.h b/include/net/af_vsock.h
index e302c0e804d0..535701efc1e5 100644
--- a/include/net/af_vsock.h
+++ b/include/net/af_vsock.h
@@ -137,7 +137,6 @@ struct vsock_transport {
u64 (*stream_rcvhiwat)(struct vsock_sock *);
bool (*stream_is_active)(struct vsock_sock *);
bool (*stream_allow)(u32 cid, u32 port);
- int (*set_rcvlowat)(struct vsock_sock *vsk, int val);
/* SEQ_PACKET. */
ssize_t (*seqpacket_dequeue)(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct msghdr *msg,
@@ -168,6 +167,7 @@ struct vsock_transport {
struct vsock_transport_send_notify_data *);
/* sk_lock held by the caller */
void (*notify_buffer_size)(struct vsock_sock *, u64 *);
+ int (*notify_set_rcvlowat)(struct vsock_sock *vsk, int val);
/* Shutdown. */
int (*shutdown)(struct vsock_sock *, int);
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index 816725af281f..54ba7316f808 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -2264,8 +2264,13 @@ static int vsock_set_rcvlowat(struct sock *sk, int val)
transport = vsk->transport;
- if (transport && transport->set_rcvlowat)
- return transport->set_rcvlowat(vsk, val);
+ if (transport && transport->notify_set_rcvlowat) {
+ int err;
+
+ err = transport->notify_set_rcvlowat(vsk, val);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvlowat, val ? : 1);
return 0;
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c
index 7cb1a9d2cdb4..e2157e387217 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c
@@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ int hvs_notify_send_post_enqueue(struct vsock_sock *vsk, ssize_t written,
}
static
-int hvs_set_rcvlowat(struct vsock_sock *vsk, int val)
+int hvs_notify_set_rcvlowat(struct vsock_sock *vsk, int val)
{
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
@@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ static struct vsock_transport hvs_transport = {
.notify_send_pre_enqueue = hvs_notify_send_pre_enqueue,
.notify_send_post_enqueue = hvs_notify_send_post_enqueue,
- .set_rcvlowat = hvs_set_rcvlowat
+ .notify_set_rcvlowat = hvs_notify_set_rcvlowat
};
static bool hvs_check_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists