[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <9C33887F-8A88-4973-8593-7936E36AFCE1@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 13:03:05 +0530
From: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] perf build: Shellcheck support for OUTPUT
directory
> On 05-Dec-2023, at 1:15 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Em Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 11:49:59AM +0530, Athira Rajeev escreveu:
>>
>>
>>> On 30-Nov-2023, at 3:04 AM, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Migrate Makefile.tests to Build so that variables like rule_mkdir are
>>> defined via Makefile.build (needed so the output directory can be
>>> created). This requires SHELLCHECK being exported and the clean rule
>>> tweaking to remove the files in find.
>>>
>>> Change find "-perm -o=x" as it was failing on my Debian based Linux
>>> kernel tree, switch to using "-executable".
>>>
>>> Adding a filename prefix of "." to the shellcheck log files is a pain
>>> and error prone in make, remove this prefix and just add the
>>> shellcheck log files to .gitignore.
>>>
>>> Fix the command echo so that running the test is displayed.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 1638b11ef815 ("perf tools: Add perf binary dependent rule for shellcheck log in Makefile.perf")
>>> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
>>
>> Hi Ian,
>>
>> Changes looks good to me.
>> Tested with make, make clean, make with shellcheck error, make with NO_SHELLCHECK
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Next time please reply with your Reviewed-by to the cover letter, so
> that b4 stamps your reviewed-by to all the patches and not just to the
> patch that you replied to.
Hi Arnaldo,
Ok Sure.
>
> This time I'll take the plural in "Changes look good to me" to signify
> that you reviewed the whole series, ok?
Yes, please add my Reviewed-by for the whole series.
Thanks
Athira
>
> - Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists