linux-kernel - Re: [EXT] Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Node migration between memory tiers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 5 Dec 2023 09:35:44 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To:     Srinivasulu Thanneeru <sthanneeru.opensrc@...ron.com>
Cc:     aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
        hasanalmaruf@...com, haowang3@...com, ying.huang@...el.com,
        gregory.price@...verge.com, tj@...nel.org,
        hezhongkun.hzk@...edance.com, fvdl@...gle.com, john@...alactic.com,
        emirakhur@...ron.com, vtavarespetr@...ron.com,
        Ravis.OpenSrc@...ron.com, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Node migration between memory tiers

On Tue 05-12-23 01:26:07, Srinivasulu Thanneeru wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12/4/2023 9:13 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > CAUTION: EXTERNAL EMAIL. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and were expecting this message.
> > 
> > 
> > On Fri 01-12-23 03:34:20, sthanneeru.opensrc@...ron.com wrote:
> > > From: Srinivasulu Thanneeru <sthanneeru.opensrc@...ron.com>
> > > 
> > > The memory tiers feature allows nodes with similar memory types
> > > or performance characteristics to be grouped together in a
> > > memory tier. However, there is currently no provision for
> > > moving a node from one tier to another on demand.
> > 
> > Could you expand on why this is really needed/necessary? What is the
> > actual usecase?
> 
> Hi Michal Hock,
> 
> Following two use-cases we have observed.
> 1. It is not accurate to group similar memory types in the same tier,
>    because even similar memory types may have different speed grades.

Presumably they are grouped based on a HW configuration. Does that mean
that the configuration is wrong? Are you trying to workaround that by
this interface?

> 2. Some systems boots up with CXL devices and DRAM on the same memory-tier,
> we need a way to move the CXL nodes to the correct tier from the user space.

Again, could you expand a bit more and explain why this cannot be
configured automatically?
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs