[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231205083924.48933-1-dqfext@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 16:39:24 +0800
From: Qingfang DENG <dqfext@...il.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] riscv: introduce RISCV_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
Hi,
You may as well remove the -mstrict-align CFLAGS in the Makefile, if
this option is enabled:
--- a/arch/riscv/Makefile
+++ b/arch/riscv/Makefile
@@ -108,7 +108,9 @@ KBUILD_AFLAGS_MODULE += $(call as-option,-Wa$(comma)-mno-relax)
# unaligned accesses. While unaligned accesses are explicitly allowed in the
# RISC-V ISA, they're emulated by machine mode traps on all extant
# architectures. It's faster to have GCC emit only aligned accesses.
+ifneq ($(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS),y)
KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mstrict-align)
+endif
ifeq ($(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK),y)
prepare: stack_protector_prepare
--
- Qingfang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists