[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <42d85b15-9ffd-4a08-b51e-a3367e57d128@suswa.mountain>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 12:05:02 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
regressions@...ts.linux.dev, davidgow@...gle.com,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, tzimmermann@...e.de,
airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch,
Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: Kunit drm_test_check_plane_state: EXPECTATION FAILED at
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_plane_helper_test.c:123
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 09:37:05AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Naresh,
>
> Thanks for the report
>
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 11:05:36PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > The Kunit drm_plane_helper failed on all devices running Linux next-20231204
> >
> > ## Test Regressions (compared to next-20231201)
> > * qemu-armv7, kunit and
> > * x86, kunit
> > - drm_test_check_invalid_plane_state_downscaling_invalid
> > - drm_test_check_invalid_plane_state_drm_plane_helper
> > - drm_test_check_invalid_plane_state_drm_test_check_invalid_plane_state
> > - drm_test_check_invalid_plane_state_positioning_invalid
> > - drm_test_check_invalid_plane_state_upscaling_invalid
> > - drm_test_check_plane_state_clipping_rotate_reflect
> > - drm_test_check_plane_state_clipping_simple
> > - drm_test_check_plane_state_downscaling
> > - drm_test_check_plane_state_drm_test_check_plane_state
> > - drm_test_check_plane_state_positioning_simple
> > - drm_test_check_plane_state_rounding1
> > - drm_test_check_plane_state_rounding2
> > - drm_test_check_plane_state_rounding3
> > - drm_test_check_plane_state_rounding4
> > - drm_test_check_plane_state_upscaling
>
> I found the source of failure to be f1e75da5364e ("drm/atomic: Loosen FB
> atomic checks").
>
> Fortunately for us, it's already been reverted yesterday for some
> unrelated reason, so it should be fixed in next-20231205 onward.
Sorry, that's a bummer that these patches were reverted. :( The whole
episode was a bit unfortunate...
Qualcom has been working on those patches for a year. They must not be
using kunit testing as part of their QC... It's some kind of
communication failure on our part.
Hopefully we can get this all sorted out and re-apply the patches soon.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists