[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <369dfa0c-315d-47a9-81fc-c166c9632bac@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 10:16:22 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 00/17] dt-bindings: samsung: add specific
compatibles for existing SoC
On 28/11/2023 21:58, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 06:49:23PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 08 Nov 2023 11:43:26 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Merging
>>> =======
>>> I propose to take entire patchset through my tree (Samsung SoC), because:
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>>> 1. Next cycle two new SoCs will be coming (Google GS101 and ExynosAutov920), so
>>> they will touch the same lines in some of the DT bindings (not all, though).
>>> It is reasonable for me to take the bindings for the new SoCs, to have clean
>>> `make dtbs_check` on the new DTS.
>>> 2. Having it together helps me to have clean `make dtbs_check` within my tree
>>> on the existing DTS.
>>> 3. No drivers are affected by this change.
>>> 4. I plan to do the same for Tesla FSD and Exynos ARM32 SoCs, thus expect
>>> follow up patchsets.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>
>> Applied, thanks!
>>
>> [12/17] dt-bindings: pwm: samsung: add specific compatibles for existing SoC
>> commit: 5d67b8f81b9d598599366214e3b2eb5f84003c9f
>
> You didn't honor (or even comment) Krzysztof's proposal to take the
> whole patchset via his tree (marked above). Was there some off-list
> agreement?
>
It was also written in the PWM patch itself (under changelog ---) and
expressed with my "applied" response when I took everything. I am
sending now another set, also touching PWM.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists