linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/6] dt-bindings: samsung: continued - add specific compatibles for Tesla FSD Hi,

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20231205092229.19135-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue,  5 Dec 2023 10:22:23 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-fsd@...la.com,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] dt-bindings: samsung: continued - add specific compatibles for Tesla FSD Hi,

Merging
=======
I propose to take entire patchset through my tree (Samsung SoC), because:
1. I already took similar work this cycle:
   https://lore.kernel.org/all/169997520487.6747.17671551558724027958.b4-ty@linaro.org/
2. Two new SoCs are coming (Google GS101 and ExynosAutov920) and they might
   touch the same lines.  It is reasonable for me to take the bindings for the new
   SoCs, to have clean `make dtbs_check` on the new DTS.
3. Having it together helps me to have clean `make dtbs_check` within my tree
   on the existing DTS.
4. No drivers are affected by this change.

If folks agree, please kindly Ack the patches.

Description
===========
See:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231108104343.24192-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Krzysztof Kozlowski (6):
  dt-bindings: i2c: exynos5: add specific compatible for Tesla FSD
  dt-bindings: pwm: samsung: add specific compatible for Tesla FSD
  dt-bindings: serial: samsung: add specific compatible for Tesla FSD
  dt-bindings: samsung: exynos-pmu: add specific compatible for Tesla
    FSD
  dt-bindings: watchdog: samsung: add specific compatible for Tesla FSD
  arm64: dts: fsd: add specific compatibles for Tesla FSD

 .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-exynos5.yaml  |  1 +
 .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml  |  1 +
 .../bindings/serial/samsung_uart.yaml         |  1 +
 .../bindings/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.yaml      |  1 +
 .../bindings/watchdog/samsung-wdt.yaml        | 21 +++++++-----
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/tesla/fsd.dtsi            | 32 +++++++++----------
 6 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

-- 
2.34.1