linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: clock: sophgo: Add CV1800 bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <05d17d6d-490e-4524-ab1c-4ccc27b0d7bc@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 5 Dec 2023 12:17:27 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>,
        Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>, qiujingbao.dlmu@...il.com,
        dlan@...too.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: clock: sophgo: Add CV1800 bindings

On 05/12/2023 10:43, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> Add definition for the clock controller of the CV1800 series SoC.
> 

If there is going to be resend:

A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "bindings". The
"dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.

> Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>
> Link: https://github.com/milkv-duo/duo-files/blob/main/hardware/CV1800B/CV1800B-CV1801B-Preliminary-Datasheet-full-en.pdf
> ---


> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..6a9897b34978
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */

Why not dual-license? Checkpatch complains about this, so are you sure
you run it?


Best regards,
Krzysztof