[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZXCRp78pD0ZMTMBw@tiehlicka>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 16:22:15 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To: Ravi Jonnalagadda <ravis.opensrc@...ron.com>
Cc: Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, emirakhur@...ron.com, fvdl@...gle.com,
gregory.price@...verge.com, hannes@...xchg.org, haowang3@...com,
hasanalmaruf@...com, hezhongkun.hzk@...edance.com,
john@...alactic.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, sthanneeru.opensrc@...ron.com, tj@...nel.org,
vtavarespetr@...ron.com, ying.huang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Node migration between memory tiers
On Tue 05-12-23 14:49:58, Ravi Jonnalagadda wrote:
[...]
> There was a prior discussion on this functionality in a previous thread, where
> Huang Ying thought this might be a useful feature to overcome limitations of
> systems where nodes with different bandwidth characteristics are grouped in
> a single tier.
Please summarize all those prior discussions into the cover letter.
Usecases are really crucial for the justification.
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists