[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <iecwyzsamuwhatodicsfptf3dgl5nglrdqyennmhagpjz7yrtr@r72gejcvhi6w>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 12:41:28 -0600
From: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc: martin.petersen@...cle.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, quic_cang@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] scsi: ufs: qcom: Fail ufs_qcom_power_up_sequence()
when core_reset fails
On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 08:44:11PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Even though core_reset is optional, a failure during assert/deassert should
> be considered fatal, if core_reset is available. So fail
> ufs_qcom_power_up_sequence() if an error happens during reset and also get
> rid of the redundant warning as the ufs_qcom_host_reset() function itself
> prints error messages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> index 604273a22afd..4948dd732aae 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> @@ -359,8 +359,7 @@ static int ufs_qcom_power_up_sequence(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> /* Reset UFS Host Controller and PHY */
> ret = ufs_qcom_host_reset(hba);
I noticed that ufs_qcom_host_reset() doesn't return an error if
reset_control_deassert() fails. Can you address this in the next spin of
the series (I don't think its in the following patches that I glanced
through).
Thanks,
Andrew
> if (ret)
> - dev_warn(hba->dev, "%s: host reset returned %d\n",
> - __func__, ret);
> + return ret;
>
> /* phy initialization - calibrate the phy */
> ret = phy_init(phy);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists