[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231206190356.GD2692119@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 15:03:56 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, ankita@...dia.com,
Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>, oliver.upton@...ux.dev,
suzuki.poulose@....com, yuzenghui@...wei.com, will@...nel.org,
ardb@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, gshan@...hat.com,
aniketa@...dia.com, cjia@...dia.com, kwankhede@...dia.com,
targupta@...dia.com, vsethi@...dia.com, acurrid@...dia.com,
apopple@...dia.com, jhubbard@...dia.com, danw@...dia.com,
mochs@...dia.com, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
lpieralisi@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] KVM: arm64: allow the VM to select DEVICE_* and
NORMAL_NC for IO memory
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 06:58:44PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> -------------8<----------------------------
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> index 1929103ee59a..b89d2dfcd534 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> @@ -1863,7 +1863,7 @@ int vfio_pci_core_mmap(struct vfio_device *core_vdev, struct vm_area_struct *vma
> * See remap_pfn_range(), called from vfio_pci_fault() but we can't
> * change vm_flags within the fault handler. Set them now.
> */
> - vm_flags_set(vma, VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP | VM_DONTEXPAND | VM_DONTDUMP);
> + vm_flags_set(vma, VM_VFIO | VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP | VM_DONTEXPAND | VM_DONTDUMP);
> vma->vm_ops = &vfio_pci_mmap_ops;
>
> return 0;
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 418d26608ece..6df46fd7836a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -391,6 +391,13 @@ extern unsigned int kobjsize(const void *objp);
> # define VM_UFFD_MINOR VM_NONE
> #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_USERFAULTFD_MINOR */
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> +#define VM_VFIO_BIT 39
> +#define VM_VFIO BIT(VM_VFIO_BIT)
> +#else
> +#define VM_VFIO VM_NONE
> +#endif
> +
> /* Bits set in the VMA until the stack is in its final location */
> #define VM_STACK_INCOMPLETE_SETUP (VM_RAND_READ | VM_SEQ_READ | VM_STACK_EARLY)
> -------------8<----------------------------
>
> In KVM, Akita's patch would take this into account, not just rely on
> "device==true".
Yes, Ankit let's try this please. I would not call it VM_VFIO though
VM_VFIO_ALLOW_WC ?
Introduce it in a separate patch and summarize this thread, with a
suggested-by from Catalin :)
Cc Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> too as x86 kvm might
support the idea
> I think that's a key argument. The VMM cannot, on its own, configure the
> BAR and figure a way to communicate this to the guest. We could invent
> some para-virtualisation/trapping mechanism but that's unnecessarily
> complicated. In the DPDK case, DPDK both configures and interacts with
> the device. In the VMM/VM case, we need the VM to do this, we can't
> split the configuration in VMM and interaction with the device in the
> VM.
Yes
Thanks,
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists