[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJD7tkZb71Tr=se96hrtEWc5oXXwdYOLMayNkkiP1ymcKBjNig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 13:13:35 -0800
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
To: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>
Cc: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
cerasuolodomenico@...il.com, sjenning@...hat.com,
ddstreet@...e.org, vitaly.wool@...sulko.com, mhocko@...nel.org,
roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, shakeelb@...gle.com,
muchun.song@...ux.dev, chrisl@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
kernel-team@...a.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, shuah@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 6/6] zswap: shrinks zswap pool based on memory pressure
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 11:47 AM Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
> >
> > Hmm so how should we proceed from here? How about this:
> >
> > a) I can send a fixlet to move the enablement check above the stats
> > flushing + use mem_cgroup_flush_stats
> > b) Then maybe, you can send a fixlet to update this new callsite?
> >
> > Does that sound reasonable?
>
> I just sent out the fixlet. Yosry and Chengming, let me know if that
> looks good. Thank you both for detecting this issue and proposing the
> fix!
The fixlet looks good, and Andrew already took care of (b) before I
could send a followup fixlet out :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists