[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <170190003691.3402358.13173057171065129546.robh@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 16:00:40 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-fsd@...la.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: i2c: exynos5: add specific compatible
for Tesla FSD
On Tue, 05 Dec 2023 10:22:24 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Tesla FSD is a derivative of Samsung Exynos SoC, thus just like the
> others it reuses several devices from older designs. Historically we
> kept the old (block's) compatible only. This works fine and there is no
> bug here, however guidelines expressed in
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst state that:
> 1. Compatibles should be specific.
> 2. We should add new compatibles in case of bugs or features.
>
> Add Tesla FSD compatible specific to be used with an existing fallback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>
> ---
>
> I propose to take the patch through Samsung SoC (me). See cover letter
> for explanation.
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-exynos5.yaml | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists