linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: Update references to the Intel SDM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52aa01f5-5384-4e8e-9946-af6934280b7e@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 6 Dec 2023 15:03:48 -0800
From:   Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC:     <x86@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: Update references to the Intel SDM

On 12/6/2023 2:13 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 01:38:46AM +0000, Sohil Mehta wrote:
>> I am open to suggestions, is there a better way to do this?
> 
> Yes, drop the references and make the comments self-contained. 

Sure, I can take a shot at that.

> 
> If the comment is outdated, drop it and also explain why you're dropping
> it.
> 

Sounds good.

Sohil