[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1ccb1e57-1aef-4797-b6d2-ab59efa488db@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 10:26:46 +0000
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
To: James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: mm: Always make sw-dirty PTEs hw-dirty in
pte_modify
On 04/12/2023 17:26, James Houghton wrote:
> Make it impossible to create a sw-dirty, hw-clean PTE with pte_modify.
> Such a PTE should be impossible to create, and there may be places that
> assume that pte_dirty() implies pte_hw_dirty().
>
> Signed-off-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index b19a8aee684c..79ce70fbb751 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -834,6 +834,12 @@ static inline pte_t pte_modify(pte_t pte, pgprot_t newprot)
> pte = set_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_DIRTY));
>
> pte_val(pte) = (pte_val(pte) & ~mask) | (pgprot_val(newprot) & mask);
> + /*
> + * If we end up clearing hw dirtiness for a sw-dirty PTE, set hardware
> + * dirtiness again.
> + */
> + if (pte_sw_dirty(pte))
> + pte = pte_mkdirty(pte);
> return pte;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists