[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231206103702.3873743-4-surenb@google.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 02:36:57 -0800
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
aarcange@...hat.com, lokeshgidra@...gle.com, peterx@...hat.com,
david@...hat.com, ryan.roberts@....com, hughd@...gle.com,
mhocko@...e.com, axelrasmussen@...gle.com, rppt@...nel.org,
willy@...radead.org, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, jannh@...gle.com,
zhangpeng362@...wei.com, bgeffon@...gle.com,
kaleshsingh@...gle.com, ngeoffray@...gle.com, jdduke@...gle.com,
surenb@...gle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 3/5] selftests/mm: call uffd_test_ctx_clear at the end of
the test
uffd_test_ctx_clear() is being called from uffd_test_ctx_init() to unmap
areas used in the previous test run. This approach is problematic because
while unmapping areas uffd_test_ctx_clear() uses page_size and nr_pages
which might differ from one test run to another.
Fix this by calling uffd_test_ctx_clear() after each test is done.
Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c | 4 +---
tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.h | 1 +
tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c | 5 ++++-
tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c | 1 +
4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c
index 02b89860e193..583e5a4cc0fd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ static inline void munmap_area(void **area)
*area = NULL;
}
-static void uffd_test_ctx_clear(void)
+void uffd_test_ctx_clear(void)
{
size_t i;
@@ -298,8 +298,6 @@ int uffd_test_ctx_init(uint64_t features, const char **errmsg)
unsigned long nr, cpu;
int ret;
- uffd_test_ctx_clear();
-
ret = uffd_test_ops->allocate_area((void **)&area_src, true);
ret |= uffd_test_ops->allocate_area((void **)&area_dst, false);
if (ret) {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.h b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.h
index 7c4fa964c3b0..870776b5a323 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.h
@@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ extern uffd_test_ops_t *uffd_test_ops;
void uffd_stats_report(struct uffd_args *args, int n_cpus);
int uffd_test_ctx_init(uint64_t features, const char **errmsg);
+void uffd_test_ctx_clear(void);
int userfaultfd_open(uint64_t *features);
int uffd_read_msg(int ufd, struct uffd_msg *msg);
void wp_range(int ufd, __u64 start, __u64 len, bool wp);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c
index 469e0476af26..7e83829bbb33 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c
@@ -323,8 +323,10 @@ static int userfaultfd_stress(void)
uffd_stats_reset(args, nr_cpus);
/* bounce pass */
- if (stress(args))
+ if (stress(args)) {
+ uffd_test_ctx_clear();
return 1;
+ }
/* Clear all the write protections if there is any */
if (test_uffdio_wp)
@@ -354,6 +356,7 @@ static int userfaultfd_stress(void)
uffd_stats_report(args, nr_cpus);
}
+ uffd_test_ctx_clear();
return 0;
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
index 2709a34a39c5..e7d43c198041 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
@@ -1319,6 +1319,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
continue;
}
test->uffd_fn(&args);
+ uffd_test_ctx_clear();
}
}
--
2.43.0.rc2.451.g8631bc7472-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists