[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231206104318.182759-2-ytcoode@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 18:43:16 +0800
From: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ACPI/NUMA: Remove unnecessary check in acpi_parse_gi_affinity()
The acpi_map_pxm_to_node() function will never return a node value
that is greater than or equal to MAX_NUMNODES. Remove the unnecessary
`node >= MAX_NUMNODES` check to keep the code consistent with other users
of the acpi_map_pxm_to_node() function.
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@...il.com>
---
drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
index 12f330b0eac0..9d2d0deb256e 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ acpi_parse_gi_affinity(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
return -EINVAL;
node = acpi_map_pxm_to_node(gi_affinity->proximity_domain);
- if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE || node >= MAX_NUMNODES) {
+ if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) {
pr_err("SRAT: Too many proximity domains.\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists