linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] drm/msm/adreno: Split up giant device table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJprhH_HgftREL4UQuKEDiNsTOUrCh74v8OLwm6bm75SqyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 6 Dec 2023 14:49:36 +0200
From:   Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
        Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] drm/msm/adreno: Split up giant device table

On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 at 14:29, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/5/23 23:03, Rob Clark wrote:
> > From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> >
> > Split into a separate table per generation, in preparation to move each
> > gen's device table to it's own file.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++---
> >   1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
> > index 41b13dec9bef..36392801f929 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
> > @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ bool allow_vram_carveout = false;
> >   MODULE_PARM_DESC(allow_vram_carveout, "Allow using VRAM Carveout, in place of IOMMU");
> >   module_param_named(allow_vram_carveout, allow_vram_carveout, bool, 0600);
> >
> > -static const struct adreno_info gpulist[] = {
> > +static const struct adreno_info a2xx_gpus[] = {
> >       {
> >               .chip_ids = ADRENO_CHIP_IDS(0x02000000),
> >               .family = ADRENO_2XX_GEN1,
> > @@ -55,6 +55,12 @@ static const struct adreno_info gpulist[] = {
> >               .inactive_period = DRM_MSM_INACTIVE_PERIOD,
> >               .init  = a2xx_gpu_init,
> >       }, {
> > +             /* sentinal */
> sentinel?
>
> > +     }
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct adreno_info a3xx_gpus[] = {
> > +     {
> >               .chip_ids = ADRENO_CHIP_IDS(
> >                       0x03000512,
> >                       0x03000520
> > @@ -110,6 +116,12 @@ static const struct adreno_info gpulist[] = {
> >               .inactive_period = DRM_MSM_INACTIVE_PERIOD,
> >               .init  = a3xx_gpu_init,
> >       }, {
> > +             /* sentinal */
> > +     }
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct adreno_info a4xx_gpus[] = {
> > +     {
> >               .chip_ids = ADRENO_CHIP_IDS(0x04000500),
> >               .family = ADRENO_4XX,
> >               .revn  = 405,
> > @@ -143,6 +155,12 @@ static const struct adreno_info gpulist[] = {
> >               .inactive_period = DRM_MSM_INACTIVE_PERIOD,
> >               .init  = a4xx_gpu_init,
> >       }, {
> > +             /* sentinal */
> > +     }
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct adreno_info a5xx_gpus[] = {
> > +     {
> >               .chip_ids = ADRENO_CHIP_IDS(0x05000600),
> >               .family = ADRENO_5XX,
> >               .revn = 506,
> > @@ -268,6 +286,12 @@ static const struct adreno_info gpulist[] = {
> >               .init = a5xx_gpu_init,
> >               .zapfw = "a540_zap.mdt",
> >       }, {
> > +             /* sentinal */
> > +     }
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct adreno_info a6xx_gpus[] = {
> > +     {
> >               .chip_ids = ADRENO_CHIP_IDS(0x06010000),
> >               .family = ADRENO_6XX_GEN1,
> >               .revn = 610,
> > @@ -493,6 +517,12 @@ static const struct adreno_info gpulist[] = {
> >               .hwcg = a690_hwcg,
> >               .address_space_size = SZ_16G,
> >       }, {
> > +             /* sentinal */
> > +     }
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct adreno_info a7xx_gpus[] = {
> > +     {
> >               .chip_ids = ADRENO_CHIP_IDS(0x07030001),
> >               .family = ADRENO_7XX_GEN1,
> >               .fw = {
> > @@ -522,7 +552,18 @@ static const struct adreno_info gpulist[] = {
> >               .zapfw = "a740_zap.mdt",
> >               .hwcg = a740_hwcg,
> >               .address_space_size = SZ_16G,
> > -     },
> > +     }, {
> > +             /* sentinal */
> > +     }
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct adreno_info *gpulist[] = {
> > +     a2xx_gpus,
> > +     a3xx_gpus,
> > +     a4xx_gpus,
> > +     a5xx_gpus,
> > +     a6xx_gpus,
> > +     a7xx_gpus,
> >   };
> >
> >   MODULE_FIRMWARE("qcom/a300_pm4.fw");
> > @@ -557,12 +598,14 @@ static const struct adreno_info *adreno_info(uint32_t chip_id)
> >   {
> >       /* identify gpu: */
> >       for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(gpulist); i++) {
> > -             const struct adreno_info *info = &gpulist[i];
> > -             if (info->machine && !of_machine_is_compatible(info->machine))
> > -                     continue;
> > -             for (int j = 0; info->chip_ids[j]; j++)
> I'm not sure using sentinels here is a good idea, it adds a
> whole lot of stack size. Perhaps gpulist could be a struct
> of array pointers and an array of sizes?

My 2c would be to reimplement it as a of_device_id.data and thus the
device_match_data.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry