linux-kernel - Re: [Patch v8 0/6] ledtrig-tty: add additional tty state evaluation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e69d088b1aedfef330eace35699670c6@dev.tdt.de>
Date:   Wed, 06 Dec 2023 14:57:20 +0100
From:   Florian Eckert <fe@....tdt.de>
To:     Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc:     Eckert.Florian@...glemail.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        jirislaby@...nel.org, pavel@....cz, kabel@...nel.org,
        u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, m.brock@...mierlo.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v8 0/6] ledtrig-tty: add additional tty state evaluation



On 2023-12-06 14:47, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Dec 2023, Florian Eckert wrote:
>> On 2023-12-01 11:40, Lee Jones wrote:

>> > Applied, thanks!
>> >
>> > [1/6] tty: add new helper function tty_get_tiocm
>> >       commit: 5d11a4709f552fa139c2439fead05daeb064a6f4
>> > [2/6] leds: ledtrig-tty: free allocated ttyname buffer on deactivate
>> >       (no commit info)
>> > [3/6] leds: ledtrig-tty: change logging if get icount failed
>> >       (no commit info)
>> > [4/6] leds: ledtrig-tty: replace mutex with completion
>> >       (no commit info)
>> > [5/6] leds: ledtrig-tty: make rx tx activitate configurable
>> >       (no commit info)
>> > [6/6] leds: ledtrig-tty: add additional line state evaluation
>> >       (no commit info)
>> 
>> I think that was a mistake? Patchset v9 is the correct patchset [1]?
>> 
>> Thanks for applying v9 [1]
> 
> It's automated.  Not sure what happened now.
> 
> Please check to ensure the correct set was applied.

I have checked that v9 is appled to the branch for-leds-next [1].
I can confirm that v9 patchset is applied there.

Thanks

Best regards

Florian

Links:
[1] 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/leds.git/log/?h=for-leds-next