[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231207151917.GA20401@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 16:19:17 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>, Li Feng <fengli@...rtx.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"open list:BLOCK LAYER" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:VIRTIO BLOCK AND SCSI DRIVERS"
<virtualization@...ts.linux.dev>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_blk: set the default scheduler to none
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 03:55:17PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > This seems similar to commit f8b12e513b95 ("virtio_blk: revert
> > QUEUE_FLAG_VIRT addition") where changing the default sounded good in
> > theory but exposed existing users to performance regressions. [...]
> > I don't want to be overly conservative. The virtio_blk driver has
> > undergone changes in this regard from the legacy block layer to blk-mq
> > (without an I/O scheduler) to blk-mq (mq-deadline).
>
> IIRC there were also regressions in both virtio-blk and virtio-scsi
> when switching from the legacy block layer to blk-mq. So perhaps I
> *am* a bit more conservative, but based on past experience, this patch
> seems not to be a great idea for practical use cases.
Agreed. I'm in fact not exactly happy about the rather odd
BLK_MQ_F_NO_SCHED_BY_DEFAULT flag to start with.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists